Trialbee

Provides a matching and orchestration layer that ingests referrals from many channels — media, partners, registries, health data — and routes and tracks them to sites, giving sponsors one view of funnel performance.

Platform licence plus optional recruitment services.

Whatever the structure, convert it to cost per randomized patient before you compare proposals. Cost per referral is the number vendors prefer to quote and the number that tells you least.

• Channel-agnostic: measures sources against each other honestly
• Good funnel visibility from referral through randomization
• Useful when several recruitment vendors are already in play

• A measurement layer does not by itself create patients

Worth it when: Sponsors running multiple recruitment vendors who cannot see which one works.

Not worth it when: Single-vendor studies where another layer adds cost without insight.

• Deep 6 AIMines clinical records, including unstructured notes, to find eligible patients.
• AntidoteMatches patients through a network of health advocacy and publisher partners.
• CitelineTrial intelligence and site/investigator data — not a recruitment vendor.

• Trialbee vs Deep 6 AI — Referral orchestration versus patient identification.

Ask for the referral-to-randomization ratio on three studies resembling yours, in the same indication and the same countries. If a vendor will not give it, that is the answer. If your enrollment forecast itself is the shaky part, our sister publication Rock Enroll covers forecasting and rescue in depth.