Glossary

The enrollment terms sites and vendors argue about

Written from the site side. Most vendor disputes are definitional: two parties using the same word for different points in the funnel.

Patient recruitment vs patient enrollment
Recruitment is everything that gets a candidate to raise a hand. Enrollment is a signed consent and a randomization. Vendors are usually paid for the first and judged on the second, which is the root of most disputes.
Screen failure rate
The share of consented candidates who do not go on to randomize because they fail eligibility. It is measured after consent, not before — a common source of inflated vendor funnel numbers.
Clinical trial screen fail rate benchmark
There is no single benchmark. Broad cardiometabolic studies often sit in the 20–40% range while criteria-heavy oncology studies can exceed 60%. Any vendor quoting one universal number is quoting a sales figure. Use your own historical data from comparable protocols.
Pre-screening
Assessment before informed consent, typically a questionnaire or a phone call, to remove obviously ineligible candidates. It is limited by what can be asked without consent, so pre-screened does not mean eligible.
Referral to randomization ratio
How many referrals it takes to produce one randomized patient. The single most useful number for judging a recruitment vendor, and the one least often volunteered. Ask for it by indication and by country.
Randomization rate
Randomizations per site per month. It is the metric enrollment forecasts are built from and the one that reveals a struggling study earliest.
Site activation timeline
The elapsed time from site selection to the site being able to consent its first patient: contracting, budget negotiation, ethics approval, training, and supply. It routinely takes longer than the recruitment plan assumes.
Site initiation visit (SIV)
The formal visit where the sponsor or CRO trains site staff on the protocol and confirms readiness. A site cannot enroll before it happens, so SIV scheduling is an enrollment constraint, not an administrative one.
Site management organization (SMO)
An organization that operates or supports a group of research sites, handling staffing, contracting, and sometimes patient identification. Distinct from a CRO, which serves the sponsor.
What a patient recruitment company does
Generates and qualifies candidates, and increasingly supports sites in converting them: outreach, pre-screening, referral routing, scheduling support, and retention. Some also identify sites. Very few own the randomization outcome.
CRO vs patient recruitment company
A CRO runs the trial: monitoring, data, regulatory, site management. A recruitment company supplies patients into it. They can be the same vendor, which is convenient until enrollment slips and there is nobody independent to hold accountable.