What they actually do
Delivers end-to-end enrollment programs: patient outreach, site engagement and training, referral management, and retention, with a reputation for working closely with site staff rather than around them.
How they price
Program-scoped services.
Whatever the structure, convert it to cost per randomized patient before you compare proposals. Cost per referral is the number vendors prefer to quote and the number that tells you least.
Where they are strong
- Site engagement is a genuine specialty, not a line item
- Retention and adherence programs
- Experience across large multi-country programs
What to watch for
- Full-service scoping obscures channel-level performance unless you demand it
Is Continuum Clinical worth it?
Worth it when: Multi-site programs where site under-performance, not lead volume, is the problem.
Not worth it when: A single-site study needing a quick digital burst.
Continuum Clinical alternatives
Head to head
- MMG vs Continuum Clinical — Communications-led versus site-engagement-led enrollment.
Before you sign anything
Ask for the referral-to-randomization ratio on three studies resembling yours, in the same indication and the same countries. If a vendor will not give it, that is the answer. If your enrollment forecast itself is the shaky part, our sister publication Rock Enroll covers forecasting and rescue in depth.
This profile is compiled from public sources: the company's own website and case studies, trial registries, and trade press. Statements about performance are framed as questions to put to the vendor rather than claims about it. Continuum Clinical did not review or approve this page. Corrections are welcome and get made.